|
|
43.
|
|
|
<application>Eclipse</application> began life as a $40 million dollars woth of code contributed by IBM to the FOSS community, whose projects are focused on building an extensible development platform, runtimes and application frameworks for building, deploying and managing software across the entire software lifecycle. Many people know Eclipse as a Java IDE but it is much more than that. The Eclipse open source community has over 60 open source projects.
|
|
|
|
|
(no translation yet)
|
|
|
|
Located in
../docs/development/C/development.xml:100(para)
|
|
|
44.
|
|
|
Enterprise Development
|
|
|
|
|
(no translation yet)
|
|
|
|
Located in
docs/development/C/development.xml:286(para)
|
|
|
45.
|
|
|
Embedded and Device Development
|
|
|
|
|
(no translation yet)
|
|
|
|
Located in
docs/development/C/development.xml:291(para)
|
|
|
46.
|
|
|
Rich Client Platform
|
|
|
|
|
(no translation yet)
|
|
|
|
Located in
docs/development/C/development.xml:296(para)
|
|
|
47.
|
|
|
Rich Internet Applications
|
|
|
|
|
(no translation yet)
|
|
|
|
Located in
docs/development/C/development.xml:301(para)
|
|
|
48.
|
|
|
Application Frameworks
|
|
|
|
|
(no translation yet)
|
|
|
|
Located in
docs/development/C/development.xml:306(para)
|
|
|
49.
|
|
|
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM)
|
|
|
|
|
(no translation yet)
|
|
|
|
Located in
../docs/development/C/development.xml:111(para)
|
|
|
50.
|
|
|
Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)
|
|
|
|
|
(no translation yet)
|
|
|
|
Located in
../docs/development/C/development.xml:112(para)
|
|
|
51.
|
|
|
These projects can be conceptually organized into seven different "pillars" or categories: <placeholder-1/>
|
|
|
|
|
(no translation yet)
|
|
|
|
Located in
../docs/development/C/development.xml:103(para)
|
|
|
52.
|
|
|
Eclipse is licensed under the EPL 1.0, which is not compatible (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eclipse_Public_License) with the GPL, and a work created by combining a work licensed under the GPL with a work licensed under the EPL cannot be lawfully distributed. The GPL requires that "[any distributed work] that ... contains or is derived from the [GPL-licensed] Program ... be licensed as a whole ... under the terms of [the GPL].", and that the distributor not "impose any further restrictions on the recipients' exercise of the rights granted". The EPL, however, requires that anyone distributing the work grant every recipient a license to any patents that they might hold that cover the modifications they have made. Because this is a "further restriction" on the recipients, distribution of such a combined work does not satisfy the GPL. The EPL, in addition, contains a patent retaliation clause, which is incompatible with the GPL for the same reasons.
|
|
|
|
|
(no translation yet)
|
|
|
|
Located in
../docs/development/C/development.xml:116(para)
|
